🎲
Clue·Board Games
Clue
🌱Community
Loading OpenSourceSports…
Players seeking a deeper puzzle may track not only cards they have seen but also groups of possibilities. If an opponent disproves “Scarlet, Candlestick, Kitchen” without revealing the card to you, note that the opponent owns at least one of those three cards.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that tracking groups of possibilities means you can only note when an opponent disproves a single card at a time, forgetting they can disprove multiple cards simultaneously without revealing which ones. This leads to misunderstandings about how much information is actually gained from such an event.
Stay and investigate: A player who starts a turn in a room may make a suggestion there without first leaving and re-entering. Afterward, the turn ends.; Exact-roll optional: Players may stop before using the full roll. This keeps doorways accessible and reduces disputes over excess movement.; Acc...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that staying in one room for an entire turn is strictly forbidden, leading to arguments about whether they can remain inside a space without moving at all. However, the actual rule allows them to stay and investigate within a room before potentially leaving, which is why disputes usually stem from misinterpreting the exact limits of their actions.
Before playing, confirm that every named mystery card is present exactly once and that the three categories can be distinguished. Missing or duplicated cards can make the mystery impossible to solve fairly.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that missing cards are automatically disqualified without considering whether they're essential for solving the mystery, leading them to argue about which cards should be included or excluded based on their perceived importance rather than strictly adhering to the rule of having each card exactly once and all categories clearly defined.
Only the suggester may see the disproving card. A suggestion is an investigative test, not an attempt to win, and may deliberately include a card from the suggester’s own hand.
Why people argue about this
People often think that anyone can see their disproving card as long as they have one, forgetting that only the suggester is allowed to reveal their own card. This leads to arguments about who exactly gets to look at their disproval card during a Clue game.
A correct accusation ends the game, and the winner reveals the solution to verify it.; A wrong accusation eliminates only the accuser from active investigation. Their hand remains concealed and continues to participate in the disproof sequence.; If every player but one has made a wrong accusation...
Why people argue about this
People often assume that if every player except one accuses incorrectly, they're all out of the game immediately, which isn't correct according to the official verdict. Actually, each wrong accusation eliminates only the accuser and keeps them in a hidden role until another round where their hand is revealed, potentially leading to their elimination later in the sequence.
Before dealing, remove one additional random card from each category and place those three cards face up for everyone to eliminate. Then create the hidden solution from the remaining category piles and continue normally.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that removing cards from each category before dealing means they're being used in some way for the hidden solution, leading to arguments about how many of these removed cards should be included or excluded. The confusion arises because the rule specifically states they are placed face up and eliminated, not meant to form part of the hidden solution themselves.
Players may count how many cards each opponent holds, but may not view their faces. Keep the solution envelope in a central location where it cannot be disturbed or confused with dealt cards.
Why people argue about this
People often assume they can peek at their opponent's cards to see if they have a crucial clue, which is explicitly forbidden by the rule. However, the confusion arises because the key part of the rule about not viewing faces applies only to the opponents' cards, not your own, so you're allowed to look at yours without issue.
When in a room, name exactly one suspect, one weapon, and the room currently occupied. ” The room is not freely chosen—it must be the room containing the suggesting player.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that they can suggest a room different from where they are standing, leading to arguments when it's clearly stated that the room must match where the player is in order to follow the rule accurately.
Secretly inspect the three solution cards without showing them to anyone. If all three match, reveal them and win.
Why people argue about this
People often assume you can only make an accusation after secretly inspecting all three cards, which leads them to overlook that they can stop at any point if two match early, thus saving a secretive inspection for when it's absolutely necessary. The confusion arises because the rule doesn't specify whether you must inspect each card individually or just collectively before deciding to accuse.
If another player’s suggestion moved your suspect into a room, you begin your next turn there. You may make a suggestion in that room before moving, or you may move normally.
Why people argue about this
People often assume you can only make a suggestion in the room where your suspect is placed after moving there, forgetting that you must move normally first before making a suggestion, leading to misunderstandings about when exactly movement and suggesting occur.
For a multi-game match, award 3 points for a win and 1 bonus point for winning without making a suggestion that nobody could disprove. Alternatively, award 1 point per game won and play until someone reaches an agreed target.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that winning without making a suggestion means you don't get any bonus points, which leads to arguments about whether they should be awarded or not. The confusion arises because the official wording is ambiguous on what constitutes "winning without making a suggestion.
The game also needs an opaque solution envelope or equivalent concealed holder for the three solution cards. Because “envelope” is not part of the controlled equipment vocabulary, it is described here but not included in the metadata equipment array.
Why people argue about this
People often argue that they don't need to bring an actual envelope for the solution cards since the rule doesn't specify what kind of container is required. They misunderstand that "envelope" in this context refers specifically to a sealed, opaque package used for hiding items during gameplay, not just any type of enclosed space.
Players normally use the suspect piece associated with their chosen character. When fewer than the maximum number participate, leave the unused suspect pieces on their starting spaces so they remain available for suggestions.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that unused suspect pieces must be immediately removed from play after a round ends, forgetting about their associated character's clues. But actually, they should stay on their starting spaces for easy access in future rounds when another player chooses to use them with their chosen character.
When in a room, name exactly one suspect, one weapon, and the room currently occupied. ” The room is not freely chosen—it must be the room containing the suggesting player.
Why people argue about this
People often assume they can choose any room as long as it's related to their suspect and weapon choices, which confuses them about Section 4’s requirement that the suggested room must be one they're actually in. They overlook the fact that the room isn't freely chosen but is dictated by who is suggesting—forcing players to stick to the room they occupy at the moment of suggestion.
Standard Clue uses no running point total. The first player to make an accusation matching all three solution cards wins immediately.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that running point totals apply in Clue, thinking it's like other scoring sports where points are accumulated over a game. But here, the key is matching all three solution cards for victory, regardless of how many times you've played before or if someone else has matched them first - it’s about getting there last and correctly, not accumulating points.
Divide players into two teams and alternate individual turns. Teammates may share one score sheet and quietly discuss deductions, but they may not show cards to each other unless those cards are revealed through the normal disproof process.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that teammates can secretly communicate deductions without restrictions, leading to arguments about whether they're allowed to whisper hints during gameplay. The actual rule states they can discuss quietly but not show cards, which is a key point of contention and misunderstanding for players.
Divide players into two teams and alternate individual turns. Teammates may share one score sheet and quietly discuss deductions, but they may not show cards to each other unless those cards are revealed through the normal disproof process.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that teammates can secretly communicate through gestures or nods during their turns, which is explicitly forbidden by the rule; they misunderstand the requirement for cards to be revealed only in the normal disproof process, thinking it allows for more subtle team collaboration.
An individual game cannot normally tie because accusations occur one at a time. If a match ends level, play one additional game.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that if a Clue game ends tied after all accusations have been read out, they must play another round immediately without taking a break or resetting the deck. But actually, the official rule specifies playing one additional game to decide the winner, which can lead to confusion about when exactly this extra game should be played.
For two players, prepare the solution normally. After shuffling the remaining deck, place four cards face down beside the board as neutral evidence, then deal the rest evenly.
Why people argue about this
People often assume that the four face-down cards are meant for both players to deduce clues simultaneously, which would make them a shared resource. However, the official verdict clearly states they're neutral evidence placed aside, intended for use only by one player at a time as part of their strategy, leading to confusion about how and when these cards should be utilized.